Section 337 investigations use all of the forms of discovery provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: interrogatories, request for production, subpoenas, requests for admission and depositions. The real difference lies in the speed with which responses are expected and disputes are resolved. These differences are created by both the ITC Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. § § 210.1 et. seq.) and the individual Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) Ground Rules. These rules are very similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (except for the shorter time frames). The differences, however, create potential traps for the unwary.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
January 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
New York Further Amends CPLR §2106, Broadening and Clarifying the Use of Affirmations in Lieu of Affidavits and Other Sworn Statements
The evolution of Section 2106 from a narrow, procedural shortcut into a comprehensive substitute for affidavits, verifications, and other sworn statements marks a significant modernization and streamlining of New York practice, with this new amendment reflecting the legislature’s intent to align more with federal practice while preserving New York’s own unique statutory requirements.
January 9, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Navigating Workplace AI When Federal, State Policies Clash
January 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints