Recent cases, including Warshak v. United States, have signaled a shift in the law of electronic monitoring. Andy Serwin, a partner in Foley’s San Diego office, authored the article, “Case Could Signal Shift in the Law of Electronic Monitoring,” which was published in the July 10 issue of the San Diego Daily Transcript. Serwin said that Warshak was the first time the court considered the identity of the court order recipient, Yahoo!, and raised new questions. In several other recent cases, the court has considered whether an expectation of privacy exists merely through employer’s policies or whether the employer actually monitors e-mails.
Related News
25 July 2024
In the News
Donald Schroeder on Groff – ‘Supreme Court decision is inviting a more fact-based analysis’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Donald Schroeder assessed the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in a religious accommodation case as it returns to the district court in the Law360 article, “A Year After High Court Spotlight, Groff Case Still A Bellwether.”
24 July 2024
In the News
Louis Lehot Featured in Q&A on How Startups Can Prepare for IPO
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Louis Lehot features in the Q&A, "How startups can get in top shape for an IPO, according to Silicon Valley lawyer Louis Lehot," part of Business Insider's Road to IPO' series.
24 July 2024
In the News
Courtenay Brinckerhoff on Patent Cap in Drug Pricing – ‘Hard to predict if this will make a difference’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff discussed a recent bill passed in the U.S. Senate aimed at lowering drug prices by limiting the number of patents that can be asserted in cases over biosimilars in the Law360 article, “Patent Cap In Drug Pricing Bill Seen As Having Muted Effect.”