Of Counsel Thomas Mullooly was quoted in a Washington Post article, “The Electricity Innovation So Controversial That it’s Now Before the Supreme Court,” on October 20, 2015. The article discussed the oral arguments from Supreme Court case Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The case examined “demand response,” which is the method of providing energy during high demand periods, and a product that demand response companies often utilize, “negawatts.” Mullooly was quoted saying, “Our electric consumers are getting more sophisticated, more concerned about costs, and this is one of the tools that they’ve had to move into wholesale markets in a way that they perceive as being of economic benefit to them.”
People
Related News
02 May 2024
In the News
Aaron Maguregui Assesses New Third-Party Tracking Guidance Update
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui comments on the U.S. Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights’ (OCR) recently updated guidance on third-party tracking technology and its compliance implications
01 May 2024
In the News
Jana Kolarik on Health Care Compliance, AI
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Jana Kolarik emphasizes the importance of staying on top of recent changes in rules and enforcement priorities in the Relias Media article, "Compliance Requirements Continue to Change, Need Close Attention."
26 April 2024
In the News
IP Laterals Ngai Zhang and Drew Schulte Make Headlines with Move to Foley
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Ngai Zhang and Drew Schulte are featured across legal press for their recent move to the firm, including in the Law360 article, “Foley & Lardner Gains Two Perkins Coie IP Partners.”