Of Counsel Thomas Mullooly was quoted in a Washington Post article, “The Electricity Innovation So Controversial That it’s Now Before the Supreme Court,” on October 20, 2015. The article discussed the oral arguments from Supreme Court case Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The case examined “demand response,” which is the method of providing energy during high demand periods, and a product that demand response companies often utilize, “negawatts.” Mullooly was quoted saying, “Our electric consumers are getting more sophisticated, more concerned about costs, and this is one of the tools that they’ve had to move into wholesale markets in a way that they perceive as being of economic benefit to them.”
People
Related News
25 July 2024
In the News
Donald Schroeder on Groff – ‘Supreme Court decision is inviting a more fact-based analysis’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Donald Schroeder assessed the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in a religious accommodation case as it returns to the district court in the Law360 article, “A Year After High Court Spotlight, Groff Case Still A Bellwether.”
24 July 2024
In the News
Louis Lehot Featured in Q&A on How Startups Can Prepare for IPO
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Louis Lehot features in the Q&A, "How startups can get in top shape for an IPO, according to Silicon Valley lawyer Louis Lehot," part of Business Insider's Road to IPO' series.
24 July 2024
In the News
Courtenay Brinckerhoff on Patent Cap in Drug Pricing – ‘Hard to predict if this will make a difference’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff discussed a recent bill passed in the U.S. Senate aimed at lowering drug prices by limiting the number of patents that can be asserted in cases over biosimilars in the Law360 article, “Patent Cap In Drug Pricing Bill Seen As Having Muted Effect.”