Of Counsel Thomas Mullooly was quoted in a Washington Post article, “The Electricity Innovation So Controversial That it’s Now Before the Supreme Court,” on October 20, 2015. The article discussed the oral arguments from Supreme Court case Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The case examined “demand response,” which is the method of providing energy during high demand periods, and a product that demand response companies often utilize, “negawatts.” Mullooly was quoted saying, “Our electric consumers are getting more sophisticated, more concerned about costs, and this is one of the tools that they’ve had to move into wholesale markets in a way that they perceive as being of economic benefit to them.”
People
Related News
16 May 2025
In the News
Foley's East Coast Litigation Additions Highlighted in Legal Press
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Kenneth Breen, Phara Guberman, and Joseph Dowdy are featured across legal press for their recent move to the firm.
16 May 2025
In the News
Foley Attorneys Assess AI Use in Clinical Trials
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Monica Chmielewski and Kyle Faget shared insights on the growing adoption of artificial intelligence in clinical trials in the Clinical Trials Arena article, "Are regulators keeping pace with AI adoption in clinical trials?"
15 May 2025
In the News
Grace Fucci Publishes on Sustainability in Luxury Fashion
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Grace Fucci explores the intersection of luxury fashion and sustainability in The Global Legal Post article, "Can luxury fashion houses join the sustainability discussion?"