Lochmann Discusses Emerging Issue for Upcoming Proxy Season
January 11, 2018
Boston Business Journal
Partner Jessie Lochmann was featured in a Boston Business Journal article, “Behind the Boardroom Door: Ready for Proxy Season?” about an emerging issue that directors should be prepared to address during this year’s annual meetings and proxy season. These comments are from her discussion as a panelist at the National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter’s January event.
Lochmann explained, “Compensation committees will have a lot on their plates with respect to compensation structure as a result of the changes to 162(m) under the new tax law. It will likely cost companies more in 2018 and beyond to pay the same executive compensation that they are paying now, and those costs need to be considered when determining pay packages. The proportion of pay that is locked-in vs. that which is performance-based may now be reevaluated, and committees may find they like that additional flexibility in setting executive compensation. For example, without the need to meet any performance-based pay exception, Committees need not set performance goals during the first 90 days of the performance period, and they will no longer be limited to using negative discretion only in making bonus and LTIP payout decisions. However, the flexibility that comes from the changes to 162(m) must be balanced with the proxy advisory firms’ and institutional shareholders’ continued desire to see a certain percentage of pay be “at risk” and based on company performance.”
Lochmann explained, “Compensation committees will have a lot on their plates with respect to compensation structure as a result of the changes to 162(m) under the new tax law. It will likely cost companies more in 2018 and beyond to pay the same executive compensation that they are paying now, and those costs need to be considered when determining pay packages. The proportion of pay that is locked-in vs. that which is performance-based may now be reevaluated, and committees may find they like that additional flexibility in setting executive compensation. For example, without the need to meet any performance-based pay exception, Committees need not set performance goals during the first 90 days of the performance period, and they will no longer be limited to using negative discretion only in making bonus and LTIP payout decisions. However, the flexibility that comes from the changes to 162(m) must be balanced with the proxy advisory firms’ and institutional shareholders’ continued desire to see a certain percentage of pay be “at risk” and based on company performance.”
People
Related News
June 20, 2025
In the News
Brian Wheeler and Lyman Thai Comment on Private Equity's Entry into Niche Sports
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Brian Wheeler and Lyman Thai described private equity's growing investments in niche sports in the Pensions & Investments article, "Ares Management buys minority stake in French sailing team."
June 16, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian on Customs Compliance Violations – 'It's a sharply increased risk profile'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian joined the SupplyChainBrain Thought Leaders episode, "Getting Ahead of Customs Compliance Violations," to describe the heightened risk environment importers face under the current trade and regulatory regime.
June 11, 2025
In the News
Foley Named Top US Firm for IP Lateral Hires by ManagingIP
Foley & Lardner LLP was named the top United States firm for intellectual property lateral partner hires in April and May 2025 based on data from ManagingIP's Talent Tracker.