Foley Client Awarded $1.6 Million Contempt Sanction

19 December 2017 Media Contact: Jill Chanen News
Two Chinese companies have been ordered to pay $1.6 million to a Foley client for violating a final judgment barring them from making and selling tires that are “confusingly similar” in appearance to a tire made by the firm’s client.

Foley’s client, Japan-based Toyo Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd. and its U.S. affiliate, had sued one of the Chinese companies in 2014, claiming it had infringed on the appearance, or trade dress, of Toyo’s “OPMT” tire by making and selling a tire with a “confusingly similar” look. Later that year, a federal judge in Santa Ana, Calif., enjoined the company from selling tires similar to the Toyo tires.

In February 2015, Toyo filed another lawsuit against the same company , along with a sister company and the companies’ parent, making similar infringement claims about another tire made by the sister company. During discovery, the two sister companies admitted making, selling and exporting that model tire – which had a tread pattern identical to the enjoined tire - between January 2013 and August 2016.

Last month, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney found that the gross U.S. sales of the infringing tire from the time of his March 2014 final judgment for Toyo to the last offending sale were $1.6 million. He also said Toyo could seek to collect attorneys’ fees and expenses.

On Monday, Toyo asked the judge to approve more than $311,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs associated with its efforts to enforce compliance with the court’s final judgment, according to an article in Law360, “Toyo Seeks $300K in Fees After $1.6M Contempt Sanction.” Representing Toyo are partners William Robinson and Victor de Gyarfas and senior counsel Jean-Paul Ciardullo.


California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.