New SBA PPP Loan Necessity Questionnaire Is Available Prior To OMB Approval: Are Lenders Jumping the Gun?

12 November 2020 Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Blog
Author(s): Pamela L. Johnston Jamie N. Class Lisa M. Noller Michael H. Woolever

On October 26, 2020, the Small Business Administration (SBA) published notice in the federal register that it is seeking approval from the government’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to release two new forms (Form 3509 for for-profit businesses and Form 3510 for nonprofit entities) related to the approximately 42,000 loans in excess of $2.0 million that lenders made to businesses as part of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). See notice here. These forms are designed to provide information to SBA loan reviewers / auditors to permit them to evaluate and determine whether economic uncertainty made a PPP loan request necessary.  The consequences of this determination may be serious, including that the SBA may declare a borrower ineligible resulting in a lender immediately calling a loan or the SBA denying forgiveness. In certain cases, SBA auditors could refer borrowers to the Department of Justice to investigate potential criminal and/or False Claims Act liability. 

As part of the PPP application, the government required PPP borrowers to certify that “current economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the applicant" (the “Necessity Certification”).  In a series of FAQs in the second quarter of 2020, the SBA issued guidance about certain factors to be considered in the Necessity Certification, including liquidity, and the review process to be expected.  FAQ 39 stated that PPP loans in excess of $2,000,000 will be reviewed to ensure that only eligible borrowers received PPP loans. 

The new loan necessity questionnaire is part of the process to ensure that only borrowers that could make the Necessity Certification got PPP loans. The questionnaire requires the accurate disclosure of basic facts bearing on the Necessity Certification and will be used to evaluate and to screen PPP borrowers for further review before the SBA determines whether the PPP borrower has satisfied the Necessity Certification. Importantly, the questionnaire leaves room for optional comments for the PPP borrower to provide commentary and additional information to be considered in connection with the Necessity Certification. The questionnaire as a whole and the optional narrative sections must be carefully completed.

The Necessity Certification questionnaire requires disclosure of the facts below, amongst others:

  1. What was the business’s gross revenue before and during the pandemic (the second quarter 2019 compared to same period in 2020)?
  2. How was the business impacted by mandatory and voluntary shutdowns?
  3. How did the pandemic cease or alter business operations and what are the related costs?
  4. Did the business make capital improvements during the covered period?
  5. What was the business’s liquidity during the pandemic? At least as a screening matter, this requires disclosure of: 
  • the amount of cash and cash equivalents on the day before the PPP application;
  • dividends and distributions;
  • debt repayments;
  • compensation above $250,000 (annualized); 
  • value of publicly traded borrowers:  market capitalization; and 
  • value of privately held borrowers:  book value (shareholders’ equity value) on the last day of the calendar quarter before the PPP loan application.
  1. Other issues bearing on eligibility, including structure of the ownership of the business, is it owned by private equity, venture capital or hedge funds, and what is the NAICS code?
  2. Did the business receive other CARES Act monies (particularly relevant for health care providers)? 

While the required information bears on the Necessity Certification, none of the questionnaire topics was expressly part of the original application, and the questionnaire omits other topics that often were part of a borrowers’ good faith determination for the Necessity Certification.  Months after lenders approved applications, the questionnaire may insert more confusion into the process of determining whether a borrower satisfied Necessity Certification and is eligible for forgiveness.  Applying a standard retroactively is sometimes constitutional, but it also can violate due process and can be grossly unfair. Practically, it leaves the PPP borrowers with more uncertainty and need to proceed carefully.

Even though OMB approval of the Necessity Certification forms is still pending and the comment period is open until November 25, 2020, after which OMB has 30 days to complete the review process, there is some confusion about whether lenders can require borrowers to complete the questionnaire now and then send the responses to the SBA.  Ordinarily, because of the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency such as the SBA is not permitted to require an answer to a government form if the form has yet to be approved by OMB.  However, Forms 3509 and 3510 are already available on the SBA platform available to PPP lenders. Some lenders already have started sending the forms to borrowers thereby purporting to trigger the 10-day clock for returning the verified information sought by the questionnaires. Businesses that need additional time to respond may have a basis to seek additional time from their lenders because of the Paperwork Reduction Act and should consult with their lenders and advisors in identifying the proper deadline to respond.  

In addition to the uncertainty about when borrowers must submit the completed Necessity Certification questionnaire, and whether the form will be changed as part of the OMB review process, there are other open questions:  Must borrowers that have already paid back the loan, or that are not seeking forgiveness, still fill out questionnaires?  What recourse can be taken if a borrower declines to submit a response to the questionnaire (the form states that a borrower can be declared to be “ineligible” for the PPP loan)?  Can sole proprietors or other closely-held businesses choose to assert their Fifth Amendment rights and decline to answer without penalty?  

Because the Necessity Certification will be reviewed by the SBA for loans over $2.0 million, now is the time for borrowers of these larger sums to review the diligence files that they created last Spring, to finish gathering supporting documentation, provide careful consideration to answering the questions (or not), seek counsel and submit optional language to explain specific and helpful facts. Additionally, borrowers should examine again whether to pay a loan back early, hold a loan for its entire term, seek a modification of the term to five years for any non-forgiven portion, or seek forgiveness from the SBA.  Once a borrower seeks to transform the loan into a forgivable loan, the Department of Justice possesses additional enforcement tools like the False Claims Act that could make such a decision more risky than first imagined. A response to the new questionnaire could impact important legal rights and should be guided by proper professional advice and supported by appropriate documentation. More guidance from the SBA can begin to answer some of these questions and in the interim we recommend careful consideration and consultation with counsel  before responding to a Necessity Certification questionnaire.

Companies in all sectors of the economy continue to be impacted by COVID-19. Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short- and long-term impacts on their business interests, operations, and objectives. Foley provides insights and strategies across multiple industries and disciplines to deliver timely perspectives on the wide range of legal and business challenges that companies face conducting business while dealing with the impact of the coronavirus. Click here to stay up to date and ahead of the curve with our key publications addressing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. To receive this content directly in your inbox, click here and submit the form. 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.