In 1998, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit made it clear that a “business method” was patentable under the U.S. Patent Act. Since that time dozens of tax reduction strategy patents have issued while nearly 100 more are pending at the Patent Office. That, compiled with an estate planning infringement case has had a significant impact for tax advisors and their clients. Foley partners, Barry Grossman and William Weinsheimer will review relevant patent law basics and discuss the potential impact that the patenting of estate planning techniques may have on all advisors involved in the estate planning process. The panel will occur at the upcoming CSO Professional Luncheon Seminar and include Christine Albright, Winston & Strawn and Mary Lee Turk, McDermott Will & Emery as additional panelists.
People
Related Insights
May 1, 2026
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
A New DOL Joint Employment Rule? What Franchisors Need to Know
On April 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division published a proposed rule to establish a single, nationwide…
May 27, 2026
Events
ABA’s Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute 2026
Foley partner Lisa Noller, Chair of the Firm’s Litigation Department, will be speaking at the American Bar Association’s Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute in Washington, D.C. from May 27-28.
April 30, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Sizing Up The 3-Way Battle For 'Iceman' IP Rights
Trademark rights in the U.S. arise from use in commerce, not from registration alone. The Lanham Act's first-to-use framework means that a party who can demonstrate earlier, continuous commercial use of a mark holds superior rights over a later filer. This principle is the backbone of Gervin's case against Williams.