Lochmann Discusses Emerging Issue for Upcoming Proxy Season
11 January 2018
Boston Business Journal
Partner Jessie Lochmann was featured in a Boston Business Journal article, “Behind the Boardroom Door: Ready for Proxy Season?” about an emerging issue that directors should be prepared to address during this year’s annual meetings and proxy season. These comments are from her discussion as a panelist at the National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter’s January event.
Lochmann explained, “Compensation committees will have a lot on their plates with respect to compensation structure as a result of the changes to 162(m) under the new tax law. It will likely cost companies more in 2018 and beyond to pay the same executive compensation that they are paying now, and those costs need to be considered when determining pay packages. The proportion of pay that is locked-in vs. that which is performance-based may now be reevaluated, and committees may find they like that additional flexibility in setting executive compensation. For example, without the need to meet any performance-based pay exception, Committees need not set performance goals during the first 90 days of the performance period, and they will no longer be limited to using negative discretion only in making bonus and LTIP payout decisions. However, the flexibility that comes from the changes to 162(m) must be balanced with the proxy advisory firms’ and institutional shareholders’ continued desire to see a certain percentage of pay be “at risk” and based on company performance.”
Lochmann explained, “Compensation committees will have a lot on their plates with respect to compensation structure as a result of the changes to 162(m) under the new tax law. It will likely cost companies more in 2018 and beyond to pay the same executive compensation that they are paying now, and those costs need to be considered when determining pay packages. The proportion of pay that is locked-in vs. that which is performance-based may now be reevaluated, and committees may find they like that additional flexibility in setting executive compensation. For example, without the need to meet any performance-based pay exception, Committees need not set performance goals during the first 90 days of the performance period, and they will no longer be limited to using negative discretion only in making bonus and LTIP payout decisions. However, the flexibility that comes from the changes to 162(m) must be balanced with the proxy advisory firms’ and institutional shareholders’ continued desire to see a certain percentage of pay be “at risk” and based on company performance.”
People
Related News
18 September 2024
In the News
Eli Mazour Talks Patents on IPWatchdog Unleashed Podcast
Foley & Lardner of counsel Eli Mazour appeared on the IPWatchdog Unleashed podcast episode, "Problems, Solutions and the Case for Patents," to discuss patents and innovation, the Federal Circuit, the value of patents to clients, and patent strategy.
18 September 2024
In the News
Patrick Daugherty Assesses Fed Rate Cuts, Impact to Crypto Litigation
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Patrick Daugherty discussed the expected impact to crypto litigation from the U.S. Federal Reserve's recent rate cut in The National Law Journal article, "Federal Reserve's Half-Point Rate Cut Expected to Have an Impact on Crypto Litigation, Experts Say."
17 September 2024
In the News
Patrick Daugherty and Kathryn Trkla Author Chapters in "Legal Matters in Web3: A Desk Reference"
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Patrick Daugherty and Kathryn Trkla authored chapters covering commodities, derivatives and securities laws, and rules and regulations in “Legal Matters in Web3: A Desk Reference.”