Peter Tomasi on SCOTUS Clean Water Act Case – 'It's really a question of who's the burden on'
October 15, 2024
Bloomberg Law
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Peter Tomasi commented on a U.S. Supreme Court case with implications for environmental law in the Bloomberg Law article, “High Court to Take First Post-Chevron Look at Clean Water Act.”
Tomasi said the case, City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, can be boiled down to a simple question: “How specific do regulators have to be when they prepare a permit?”
“It’s really a question of who’s the burden on in terms of determining how to meet these narrative water quality standards,” Tomasi explained. “Does the permit applicant have to bear the burden of figuring out what do these narrative standards mean?”
Tomasi added that the case is really about what constitutes good public policy.
People
Related News
December 3, 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Automotive Tariff Impact on Trucking Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller discussed the ongoing disruption in trucking demand resulting from recent automotive tariffs in the TruckingDive article, “Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers.”
November 28, 2025
In the News
Cassandra Aubert Assesses Circuit Split on SEC Disgorgement Authority
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Cassandra Aubert commented on the growing scrutiny around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's disgorgement authority in the Bloomberg Law's article, “SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case."
November 25, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Analyzes SCOTUS Tariff Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian appeared in a SupplyChainBrain video interview to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case on the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and options the administration can consider should the court strike them down.