NSCP Conference Panel — Examining Ethics: Enforcement Actions and Lessons Learned
October 30, 2024
Foley partner Jim Lundy will moderate a panel at the National Society of Compliance Professionals National Conference focusing on lessons learned from enforcement actions ripped from the headlines. This session will focus on the reason for the failure of ethics programs, specific attention to up-to-date regulatory scrutiny and expectations.
Attendees will have the opportunity to:
- Analyze what went wrong in high profile cases of violations of ethical codes of conduct, examining the specific concerns of the regulators.
- Discuss the role of the Compliance Department when navigating problematic employee behavior resulting in the most challenging ethical scenarios.
- Learn how to mitigate common ethical pitfalls.
- Review the current Enforcement Division approach to CCO Liability
People
Related Insights
March 10, 2026
The Path & The Practice
Episode 133: Casey Knapp, Partner
This episode of The Path & The Practice features a conversation with Marshall Keen, a summer associate in Foley’s Dallas office.
March 10, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About…Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part II)
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decisions in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose broad-based tariffs.
March 10, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About …Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Historic IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part I)
The Supreme Court’s reversal of tariffs imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has triggered a cascading series of events. These include a forced pivot by the Trump administration towards alternative tariff authorities, activity at the Court of International Trade (CIT) aimed at securing refunds, and behind-the-scenes jockeying by companies seeking to position themselves to claim those tariff refunds.