In litigation to establish inventorship of the CRISPR gene editing technique, the Fed. Circuit provided additional guidance on how to determine when conception of an invention has occurred.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/2338726?nl_pk=95cd90ef-6b5f-45a4-a80b-037d2c8892f4&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ip&utm_content=2025-05-13&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=0?copied=1
“The appropriate analysis should turn on whether [CVC’s] scientists ‘had formed the idea of their use for that purpose in sufficiently final form that only the exercise of ordinary skill remained to reduce it to practice’ — more than a ‘general hope,’ but less than knowing with certainty that the invention would work.”

Author(s)
Related Insights
December 19, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Prohibition to Prescription: What Trump’s Marijuana Executive Order Really Means
On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order, Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research, that…
December 18, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
NAIC Issues Statement Regarding AI Executive Order
On December 16, 2025, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) issued a statement (the NAIC Statement), on the December…
December 18, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
How Companies Can Roll with NY's New Algorithmic Pricing Rules
States are racing to rein in the growing use of artificial intelligence and computer algorithms to set prices, with New York leading the charge. On Dec. 15, a major amendment to New York's antitrust law took effect, banning the use of certain algorithmic rent-setting tools for residential units under Section 340-b of the state's General Business Law.