In litigation to establish inventorship of the CRISPR gene editing technique, the Fed. Circuit provided additional guidance on how to determine when conception of an invention has occurred.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/2338726?nl_pk=95cd90ef-6b5f-45a4-a80b-037d2c8892f4&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ip&utm_content=2025-05-13&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=0?copied=1
“The appropriate analysis should turn on whether [CVC’s] scientists ‘had formed the idea of their use for that purpose in sufficiently final form that only the exercise of ordinary skill remained to reduce it to practice’ — more than a ‘general hope,’ but less than knowing with certainty that the invention would work.”
Author(s)
Related Insights
May 22, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
New Lawsuit Tests the Limits of Donor-Advised Fund Advisory Privileges
A recent lawsuit seeking to clarify the extent of an advisor’s privileges with respect to a donor-advised fund (DAF) has been filed in…
May 22, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
What the Federal Circuit’s Poultry Patent Ruling Says About 'About'
The decision does not appear to prohibit the use of terms such as "about" or "approximately." Rather, it reinforces that such terms may be acceptable where the patent record provides sufficient context for understanding the scope of the claimed range.
May 21, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Working on Borrowed Time? The Risk-Reward Calculus of Recourse Notes for Equity
Introduction One of the more nuanced tools in the executive compensation toolkit is the use of a recourse promissory note issued by an…