Discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus to reject two patents on a method for monitoring a patient’s blood to determine appropriate drug dosage as well as the decision’s potential to affect the profitability of personalized medicine, Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff said the rejection is a disruption of the status quo that may result in less funding for research. First published in an article that appeared in Reuters, Ms. Brinckerhoff’s comments later appeared in additional publications including the Chicago Tribune, Yahoo! News, BioPortfolio and The Huffington Post.
People
Related News
May 1, 2026
In the News
David Rosen Weighs in on SCOTUS Review of Skinny Label Patent Dispute
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen is featured across the media for his perspective on the U.S. Supreme Court case Hikma Pharmaceuticals v. Amarin Pharma.
April 27, 2026
In the News
Jesse Neil Featured as a Distinguished Leader in Law.com's Southeastern Legal Awards
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Jesse Neil is recognized in Law.com as one of the Distinguished Leader honorees for the 2026 Southeastern Legal Awards.
April 27, 2026
In the News
David Rosen and William Holtz Analyze FDA Approval Speed, Biotech Pressures
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys David Rosen and William Holtz are quoted in the PharmaVoice article, “FDA’s need for speed could strain small biotechs. Here’s how they can keep up,” examining the FDA’s accelerated drug approval initiatives and its impact on smaller pharmaceutical companies.