Attorneys Leah Eisenberg and Katherine Catanese co-authored an article with Arent Fox attorney Sam Lawand for the Review of Banking & Financial Services. Titled “Arbitration and Bankruptcy: A Tug of War,” the attorneys first cover how FAA pro-arbitration policies conflict with the Bankruptcy Code, then transition into the interplay between the statutory regimes for “non-core” and “core” bankruptcy matters, and finally conclude that court standards and analyses are highly dependent on the facts of their respective cases.
Read the full article via the link below.
This article was also circulated in the Daily Bankruptcy News newsletter’s August 18, 2017 edition.
Related Insights
December 29, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
Mexican January 2026 Tariff Tsunami: Maquilas Aren’t Immune
On January 1, 2026, Mexico will increase its general import tariff rate (known as the most favored nation (MFN) rate). The increase will be in the range of five to fifty percent, impacting 1,463 eight-digit tariff lines encompassing thousands of products originating in countries with which Mexico does not have a free trade agreement (FTA or the measure).
December 24, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender-Affirming Care: Multi‑State Lawsuit Challenges HHS Declaration
As previously discussed in Foley’s healthcarelawtoday, on December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what it defined as “sex rejection procedures” (SRPs), also known as gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, and outlined next steps.
December 23, 2025
Energy Current
FERC Opens New Paths for Co-Located Loads in PJM: What Data Center and Power Generation Developers Need to Know
Key Takeaways FERC has ordered PJM to overhaul its tariff framework for co-located generation and large loads, finding existing rules…