Foley Attorneys David T. Ralston, Jr. and Frank S. Murray, Jr. published a practice note in Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law. The note, “Government Contracts: Federal Procurement Protests,” provides an overview of federal agency, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and United States Court of Federal Claims bid protests that are brought by prospective bidders dissatisfied with the terms of a federal agency’s solicitation or by disappointed bidders seeking to challenge a federal agency’s contract award. The note includes a discussion of the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests compared to protests filed at the agency level and with the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 19, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender Affirming Care for Minors: CMS and HHS Propose Limits on “Sex Rejection Procedures” and Expanded Enforcement Pathways
On December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what is defined as “sex…
December 19, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Prohibition to Prescription: What Trump’s Marijuana Executive Order Really Means
On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order, Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research, that…
December 18, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…