Litigation Committee's Recommendation Rejected Amid Concerns Regarding Independence and Reasonableness of Investigation
April 5, 2010
Foley Partner Gardner Davis and Associate Joanna White authored an article that appeared in the April 5, 2010 issue of the Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter titled “Special Litigation Committee’s Recommendation Rejected Amid Concerns Regarding Independence And Reasonableness of Investigation.” The authors examine the possible impact of the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in London v. Tyrell, stating that the message of the case is that directors should not serve on special litigation committees (SLC) unless prepared to deliver bad news to the company and the defendant directors. They add that members of an SLC must avoid the appearance of divided loyalties if the company wants the court to honor an SLC recommendation.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 9, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
NAIC Fall Meeting Update: Third-Party Data and Models (H) Working Group Exposes Risk-Based Regulatory Framework for Third-Party Data and Model Vendors
On December 9, 2025, the Third-Party Data and Models (H) Working Group, which reports to the Innovation Cybersecurity and Technology (H)…
December 9, 2025
Health Care Law Today
How Following “Doctors’ Orders” Provided a Defense in a First Circuit FCA Case
When it comes to False Claims Act (FCA) litigation, clinical laboratories often find themselves in the crosshairs. But the First…
December 9, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
White House Orders Task Forces To Investigate Food Industry
Last month, we reported on the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) ramping up antitrust enforcement in the agriculture industry, including…