Evolving Healthcare Trends & Patents: Charting a Safe Course for Personalized Medicine

05 August 2014 Health Care Law Today Blog

Rapid changes resulting from personalized medicine, including the ability to use individual patient biomarker data to generate a tailored treatment, are transforming healthcare.  New business structures are evolving in the healthcare marketplace to meet the need for integrating diagnostic data to deliver individualized patient treatment. Diagnostic and therapeutic businesses are forming increasingly complex contractual arrangements and partnerships to deliver improved treatment to patients.

At the same time, patent issues in the field of personalized medicine have become more complex. One group of Supreme Court decisions (Prometheus and Myriad) has restricted the types of claims that can be granted by the US Patent Office, while leaving other claim types intact. Despite the complexity introduced into the patent process by these decisions, the need to protect inventions in personalized medicine will drive more and more patenting. In many cases, these patents are critical to provide the security that businesses need in order to invest in the promising new treatments heralded by personalized medicine.

Another recent Supreme Court decision (Limelight) has clarified that infringement of a multi-step method patent only occurs when a single party performs all steps of the patent’s claim or else directs or controls a combination of entities who perform all steps of the patent. Therefore, in the case of a personalized medicine patent having a diagnostic step and a therapeutic step, proving infringement requires evidence that a single entity performed both steps or that one entity controlled or directed others to perform the steps. The increasing level of collaboration across diagnostic and therapeutic business entities heightens the risks that such partnerships may be viewed as a single actor for purposes of patent infringement.

Charting a safe course for personalized medicine requires careful consideration of the patent issues. When businesses form new contractual arrangements or partnerships to incorporate diagnostic information for the purpose of selecting a treatment approach for an individual patient, one step they can take is to incorporate provisions addressing how infringement defense will be handled and indemnification provisions to clarify who bears the risk of infringement liability. Another step they can take is to perform a freedom to operate assessment in order to identify patent risks up front before launching a new line of service. Taking these steps may help to avoid unexpected barriers to delivering on the promise of personalized medicine.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Upcoming Webinar: Maximizing Solar Tax Credits - Navigating the Start of Construction Rules (Part 1)
17 September 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
When Birds Finally Find a Nest
17 September 2019
Dashboard Insights
DHS Moves Closer to Launching its H-1B Cap Registration System
16 September 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Be Aware of Potential Legal Restrictions When Implementing a Workplace Weapons Policy
16 September 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.