Creative Cooperation: Public-Private-Partnerships

26 August 2015 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog

Some people trust private industry and the free market to solve economic challenges and develop economic opportunities, while others prefer allowing government initiatives to address such issues. The space between these two poles may hold the answer to tackling seemingly insurmountable challenges. Collaborative efforts between the private sector and government bodies, commonly referred to as public-private-partnerships (P3s), may be just the ticket in such cases.

P3s are not a cutting-edge concept. For example, over the past three decades, SEMATECH’s partnerships with the US government and the state of New York have fostered advances in nanotechnology and semiconductors. P3s have gained momentum, perhaps in large part due to their benefits and versatility. Recently, the US and manufacturers have partnered to launch several manufacturing innovation institutes.

Challenges Facing P3s

Of course, implementing and sustaining an effective P3 presents many challenges. P3s require an understanding of capabilities and incentives. Businesses offer dynamic resources; they can usually obtain or reallocate skilled labor, space, equipment, and materials more quickly than a governmental counterpart. But businesses must be properly incentivized to pursue P3s’ goals. Otherwise, like improperly compensated employees, businesses may stray from P3s’ objectives (or worse) in favor of other attractive opportunities.

On the other hand, the government component of a P3 plays an integral but limited role. Public money typically supports P3s to some extent. Additionally, government officials may provide or establish a conduit through which otherwise rival businesses may cooperate. Governments, however, lack the agility and specialized knowledge to efficiently tackle many technical challenges. Because of these intrinsic differences, P3s present a sophisticated approach to achieve incredible synergies and tackle challenges that are too much for a single party. But you don’t have to take my word for it.

More Information

A former Chief Regulatory Officer of the State of Michigan and Chief Operating Officer of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Steve Hilfinger shares his perspective on P3s in “Strength in Numbers.” Published by the Manufacturing Leadership Journal earlier this month, “Strength in Numbers” explains the basics of P3s, how P3s have and will continue to impact the future of manufacturing, and how your company can get involved in P3s.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services