Georgia Finalizes New Telemedicine Practice Rules

21 October 2020 Health Care Law Today Blog
Authors: Sunny J. Levine Nathaniel M. Lacktman

The Georgia Composite Medical Board recently finalized a new amendment to its telemedicine practice standards. The purpose of the amendment was to address the use of technology as it relates to telemedicine, and clarify the Board’s position on the use of peripherals when conducting a patient examination via telemedicine. The amendment is effective September 28, 2020.

The Board made a slight change to Georgia Rules and Regulations Section 360-3-.07(3)(d) (“Practice Through Electronic or Other Such Means”), which enumerates three scenarios when a Georgia-licensed physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse, may provide services via telemedicine without conducting a prior in-person examination. Under the revised rule, a Georgia-licensed practitioner can offer treatment and/or consultation recommendations via telemedicine if the practitioner is “able to examine the patient using technology or peripherals that are equal or superior to an examination done personally by a provider within that provider’s standard of care.”

The previous language of the rule used the phrase “technology and peripherals,” whereas the new language clarifies the practitioner can use technology or peripherals to conduct the patient examination. Practitioners must continue to adhere to the other requirements of the rule, and the applicable standard of care.

Georgia’s telemedicine rule was originally adopted in 2014, and established the minimum standards of practice while providing treatment and/or consultation recommendations through the use of telemedicine.

For more information on telemedicine, telehealth, virtual care, remote patient monitoring, digital health, and other health innovations, including the team, publications, and representative experience, visit Foley’s Telemedicine & Digital Health Industry Team.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services