Foley Attorneys David T. Ralston, Jr. and Frank S. Murray, Jr. published a practice note in Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law. The note, “Government Contracts: Federal Procurement Protests,” provides an overview of federal agency, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and United States Court of Federal Claims bid protests that are brought by prospective bidders dissatisfied with the terms of a federal agency’s solicitation or by disappointed bidders seeking to challenge a federal agency’s contract award. The note includes a discussion of the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests compared to protests filed at the agency level and with the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 24, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender-Affirming Care: Multi‑State Lawsuit Challenges HHS Declaration
As previously discussed in Foley’s healthcarelawtoday, on December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what it defined as “sex rejection procedures” (SRPs), also known as gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, and outlined next steps.
December 23, 2025
Energy Current
FERC Opens New Paths for Co-Located Loads in PJM: What Data Center and Power Generation Developers Need to Know
Key Takeaways FERC has ordered PJM to overhaul its tariff framework for co-located generation and large loads, finding existing rules…
December 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The Rush to Exit: PE Firms Pick Up the Pace in 2025
Key Points: PE firms are moving to sell portfolio companies on an accelerated timeline in 2025 after years of much longer hold…