Courts have become more actively engaged in patent issues that are on the legislative table. The U.S. Supreme Court’s issued decision in Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics, relating to patent exhaustion, will significantly affect how high-tech and biotechnology/pharmaceutical companies structure deals and licenses as well as how they procure their patent rights.
During this session, participants learned the effects of the case on various industries, including biotechnology versus electronics, and discussed questions such as:
- How does Quanta affect the computer component maker and computer maker?
- To what extent does the patent exhaustion ruling in Quanta impact the sale of seeds or self-replicating biotechnology cultures?
Possible strategies companies might employ in light of Quanta include:
- Limiting rights to the licensee
- Targeting licensee customers and end users for licenses
- Creating clearer contractual obligations
- Exploring claim drafting alternatives
- Employing indemnification clauses
Foley Speakers
-
Pavan Agarwal, Chair, Electronics Practice
-
Stephen Maebius, Co Chair, Life Sciences Industry Team
-
Debra Nye, Senior Counsel, IP Litigation Practice
-
Harold Wegner, Partner, Chemical & Pharmaceutical Practice
Foley will apply for CLE credit after the Web conference.
People
Related Insights
18 April 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Supreme Court Ends Circuit Split with Ruling That Plaintiffs Can Seek RICO Damages for Certain Personal Injury Claims
The U.S. Supreme Court has broadened plaintiffs’ ability to sue under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) for economic loss stemming from personal injury.
30 April 2025
Events
Tariff Blitz Webinar
Join us for a wide-ranging discussion of the Trump administration tariffs and how to risk plan for them.
17 April 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
The Non-Compliant Cat in the Hat
So, just before Easter, in 1957, a little book you may have heard of, called The Cat in the Hat, made its first appearance. Theodore Geisel — writing under the name “Dr. Suess” — later said that of all his children’s books, he was proudest of this one, because “it had something to do with the death of the Dick and Jane primers,” which he thought would bore any child to tears.