The key takeaways for this program are:
- Understanding the Prometheus decision and what the Supreme Court did and did not say;
- Understanding the question at issue in Myriad and how it is similar—and different—from that decided in Prometheus;
- Learning possible patent claim strategies to protect personalized medicine methods and biotechnology inventions under the new paradigm;
- Reviewing the U.S. Patent Office Guidance to Examiners, issued shortly after the Supreme Court decided Prometheus; and
- Discussing Options for strengthening already granted patents.
People
Related Insights
June 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Texas Business Court Weighs In On Discoverability of AI Prompts
Share on Twitter
Print
Share by Email
Share
Back to top
The Texas Business Court has entered the growing national debate about whether conversations with AI tools like ChatGPT are discoverable, and it came down on the side of protection. In a minute entry filed June 3, 2026, Judge Grant Dorfman of the Eleventh Division ruled that a non-lawyer’s ChatGPT conversations, prepared in anticipation of litigation, can qualify as protected attorney work product under Texas procedural rules.
June 8, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Illinois Provides Additional Protections to Workers on Publicly Funded Projects
In 2025, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed three new bills into law to amend the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act (the Act): HB 1189, SB 1344, and HB 2488. Now approaching almost one year with these amendments on the books, it is a good time for covered employers to assess their compliance.
June 8, 2026
Energy Current
Federal Court Vacates IRS Notice 2025-42: Five Percent Safe Harbor May be Restored for Wind and Solar Projects
On Saturday, June 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated IRS Notice 2025-42 (the “Notice”), which…