Partners Richard Riley and Michael Conway presented a Web Conference titled “P&C Loss Reserves After the Acuity Decision” on Tuesday, November 12, 2013. This conference assisted participants in evaluating risk based upon legislative requirements and judicial precedents, with particular focus on the recent U.S. Tax Court decision where Acuity Insurance prevailed in its assertion that its loss reserves were fair and reasonable and represented only actual losses.
People
Related Insights
May 6, 2026
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Hot Topics in Product Stewardship: Key Regulatory Developments to Watch
Key Takeaways State‑driven regulation continues to shape product stewardship requirements, with California setting standards that may…
May 6, 2026
Foley Ignite
Investing in AI Infrastructure: Beyond Data Centers
Firms building out portfolios of interconnected companies powering AI must consider structural, regulatory, and financial issues to ensure success.
May 6, 2026
PharmaPatents
Flexibility Versus Indefiniteness: What It’s All About
In Enviro Tech Chemical Servs., Inc. v. Safe Foods Corp., the Federal Circuit recognized the permissibility of using “about” to “avoid a strict numerical boundary” for a claimed parameter, but held the claims at issue invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b). The court’s analysis highlights that the flexibility of “about” comes with a risk of invalidity, especially when the scope of the claimed range cannot be ascertained from the specification and prosecution history with reasonable certainty.