On April 30, 2007 the United States Supreme Court handed down an important decision on the scope of obviousness under 35 USC § 103.
Although the case concerned the placement of an electronic control, (i.e., a throttle control) on a vehicle control pedal, language in the decision could affect on the scope afforded claims drawn to computer implemented inventions, such as automated systems and business method patents.
Applying a “teaching, suggestion, motivation test” the Federal Circuit had reversed a District Court’s finding that a claimed vehicle control pedal was obvious.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Reprinted with permission from Portfolio Media, Inc.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 4, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…
December 4, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Foley Event Key Takeaways- Ready for Anything: Preparing for IPOs, SPACs, and Unexpected Capital Market Shift
Foley & Lardner, Protiviti and SS&C Intralinks recently hosted an event in Foley’s Silicon Valley office at Palo Alto Center. Moderated by Foley partner Louis Lehot, the session titled "Ready for Anything: Preparing for IPOs, SPACs, and Unexpected Capital Market Shifts," brought together industry leaders: JD Fay (ex-CFO, Matterport, de-SPAC’d and then sold to CoStar Group), Dan Angus (Managing Director, Nasdaq), and Andrea Vardaro Thomas (Managing Director, Protiviti). Their combined experience provided a roadmap for companies facing the volatile and rapidly shifting capital markets of 2026.
December 4, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
FDA Guidance on Biosimilars Highlights Glycosylation Profiling and Increases the Strategic Value of Patents Covering Antibodies Defined by Glycosylation
FDA’s September 2025 guidance requires detailed characterization of posttranslational modifications (PTMs), particularly glycosylation,…