On April 30, 2007 the United States Supreme Court handed down an important decision on the scope of obviousness under 35 USC § 103.
Although the case concerned the placement of an electronic control, (i.e., a throttle control) on a vehicle control pedal, language in the decision could affect on the scope afforded claims drawn to computer implemented inventions, such as automated systems and business method patents.
Applying a “teaching, suggestion, motivation test” the Federal Circuit had reversed a District Court’s finding that a claimed vehicle control pedal was obvious.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Reprinted with permission from Portfolio Media, Inc.
Author(s)
Related Insights
June 18, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Legal Reasoning Still a Struggle for LLMs
The authors in this paper created a benchmark including long-form, open-ended questions and multiple-choice questions to evaluate the…
June 18, 2025
Health Care Law Today
HIPAA Risk Analyses for Digital Health: Navigating AI, M&A and Vendor Diligence
HIPAA Security Risk Analyses (SRAs) should be the foundation of every digital health company’s cybersecurity compliance. Far more than a…
June 17, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Oregon’s New Corporate Practice of Medicine Restrictions: Five Takeaways for Digital Health and Telemedicine Companies
On June 9, 2025, Oregon’s governor signed SB 951 into law, making Oregon one of the most restrictive states in the country with respect…