On June 12, 2007, the protections associated with medical staff peer review information suffered another blow. In Adkins v. Christie, et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a state law granting a privilege for medical staff peer-review information does not apply in federal civil rights cases. The Court considered the issue, one of first impression in the circuit, and concurred with the Fourth and Seventh Circuits, which also have refused to recognize the privilege in federal civil rights cases.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Author(s)
Related Insights
January 14, 2026
Health Care Law Today
Protecting the AI Advantage: Why Patents Are a Critical Growth and Risk-Management Tool for Digital Health Platforms
For CEOs, general counsels, and CTOs, the question is no longer whether patents matter. The question is whether the company has an…
February 23, 2026
Events
International Consumer Products Health and Safety Organizaton 2026 Annual Meeting and Training Symposium
On February 23-26, the International Consumer Products Health and Safety Organization (ICPHSO) will host its 33rd Annual Meeting and Training Symposium in Orlando, Florida. This flagship event brings together global product safety professionals for four days of collaboration, learning, and networking.
February 18, 2026
Events
2026 CPG Legal Forum
On February 19, Foley partners Erik Swanholt and Kate Wegrzyn will speak at the Consumer Brands CPG Legal Forum in Frisco, Texas. Swanholt, chair of the firm’s Consumer Products Team, will serve on the panel “Take Cover from Risky Business: Insurance Considerations for Mass Tort, Class Action, Supply Chain Disruption and Recalls.” Wegrzyn, chair of Foley’s Supply Chain Team, will participate in the panel “Tariff-ied Yet? Untangling Legal Links in the Supply Chain from Ports to Courts.”