Foley Attorneys David T. Ralston, Jr. and Frank S. Murray, Jr. published a practice note in Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law. The note, “Government Contracts: Federal Procurement Protests,” provides an overview of federal agency, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and United States Court of Federal Claims bid protests that are brought by prospective bidders dissatisfied with the terms of a federal agency’s solicitation or by disappointed bidders seeking to challenge a federal agency’s contract award. The note includes a discussion of the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests compared to protests filed at the agency level and with the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Author(s)
Related Insights
July 2, 2025
Energy Current
Has SCOTUS Pre-decided Whether the NRC Can License Private Off-Site High-Level Nuclear Waste Storage Facilities?
On June 18, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in NRC v. Texas, issued an opinion holding that the State of Texas did not have standing to…
July 2, 2025
Health Care Law Today
AI-Powered Text Messaging by Digital Health Companies: Supreme Court Raises the Stakes
Digital health companies increasingly rely on AI-powered messaging platforms, chatbots, and virtual assistants to engage patients through…
July 2, 2025
Innovative Technology Insights
AI-Powered Text Messaging by Digital Health Companies: Supreme Court Raises the Stakes
Digital health companies increasingly rely on AI-powered messaging platforms, chatbots, and virtual assistants to engage patients through…