Partner Michael Conway and Senior Counsel Lauren Loew contributed an article to the November 2015 issue of the Illinois Bar Journal, “Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment: Be Careful What You Concede.” The article discussed how plaintiffs and defendants often file competing cross-motions for summary judgment. And how in Illinois, unlike in federal court, those motions may be taken as a concession that no issue of material fact exists.
Author(s)
Related Insights
May 6, 2026
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Hot Topics in Product Stewardship: Key Regulatory Developments to Watch
Key Takeaways State‑driven regulation continues to shape product stewardship requirements, with California setting standards that may…
May 6, 2026
Foley Ignite
Investing in AI Infrastructure: Beyond Data Centers
Firms building out portfolios of interconnected companies powering AI must consider structural, regulatory, and financial issues to ensure success.
May 6, 2026
PharmaPatents
Flexibility Versus Indefiniteness: What It’s All About
In Enviro Tech Chemical Servs., Inc. v. Safe Foods Corp., the Federal Circuit recognized the permissibility of using “about” to “avoid a strict numerical boundary” for a claimed parameter, but held the claims at issue invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b). The court’s analysis highlights that the flexibility of “about” comes with a risk of invalidity, especially when the scope of the claimed range cannot be ascertained from the specification and prosecution history with reasonable certainty.