Senior Counsel Alissa Nann contributed an article to Law360 on March 4, 2016, “How Will the High Court Define ‘Actual Fraud’?” In the article, Nann discussed the Supreme Court case, Husky International Electronics v. Ritz, in which the court will decide whether the discharge exception for “actual fraud” requires the debtor to have made a false representation to the creditor. Nann provided insights on the oral arguments of case and offered two main takeaways.
Author(s)
Related Insights
August 7, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Tariffs and Your Contracts: Why do pricing and tax provisions matter?
President Trump’s shakeup of U.S. trade policy with its approach to tariffs is costing companies billions of dollars.
August 7, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
USPTO Addresses Reports of New Patent Fee Structure
In a recent webinar hosted by the Licensing Executives Society, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart…
August 7, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Tariffs and Your Contracts: Introduction
The rise of President Trumps’ tariffs in 2025 has brought uncertainty to the profitability of product sales and has thrown a wrench in previously stable supply relationships.