Attorneys Catherine Zhu and Louis Lehot published an article in Westlaw Today, powered by Thomson Reuters, titled “Increasing investment in EdTech scaling beyond the pandemic.”
The article explores the increase in investments in the EdTech sector during the pandemic, and its potential for continued growth post-pandemic.
Click below to read the article.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
April 24, 2026
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
FCA v. Kamax: Michigan Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal and Leaves Uncertainty for Automotive Manufacturers
On April 22, 2026, the Michigan Supreme Court entered an order dismissing the appeal of FCA US LLC v. Kamax Inc., a case of considerable…
April 24, 2026
Energy Current
The New Energy Trade War: Why Every CEO Must Rethink Their Power Strategy Now
For decades, energy strategy was something most CEOs could comfortably delegate. Procurement teams negotiated utility contracts,…
April 23, 2026
Health Care Law Today
DEA Issues Long Awaited Final Order Rescheduling Certain Marijuana Products to Schedule III: What It Means, What It Doesn’t, and What Comes Next
Effective April 22, 2026, the Acting Attorney General issued a final order placing certain categories of marijuana and marijuana products into Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) in accordance with President Trump’s December 18, 2025 Executive Order on Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research. This is a landmark development in federal drug policy and one that carries significant legal and business consequences for entities in the pharmaceutical, cannabis, healthcare, tax, and regulatory compliance sectors. As with most everything touching marijuana, however, the details matter enormously. Importantly, the Final Order does not broadly reclassify marijuana. Instead, it defines a narrow and conditional rescheduling that includes several important caveats, added steps, and ongoing obligations that affected parties must understand.