Swift Comments on European Court of Human Rights Verdict Involving Russian Dissidents
October 25, 2017
Polygraph.info
Partner Christopher Swift was quoted in a Polygraph.info article, “Navalny vs. Russian Federation – and the winner is …,” about a European Court of Human Rights ruling in favor of Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny and his brother, Oleg.
The court held that the two activists, who had been found guilty of fraud in a Russian court, were convicted without a legal basis and were denied their right to a fair trial. It awarded them 10,000 euros each, along with their legal costs and expenses, though it rejected their claim that their prosecution had been politically motivated.
Swift said the Russian Justice Ministry’s claim of victory in the case “mischaracterizes [the] implications” of the verdict: that the Navalny brothers “were deprived of their right to a fair trial and punished unfairly” by Russia.
He also said the brothers’ appeal to the European court did not circumvent Russian law. “They’re pursuing the last appeal available to them in a forum that the Russian government accepted when it signed the [European] Convention [on Human Rights],” he said.
The court held that the two activists, who had been found guilty of fraud in a Russian court, were convicted without a legal basis and were denied their right to a fair trial. It awarded them 10,000 euros each, along with their legal costs and expenses, though it rejected their claim that their prosecution had been politically motivated.
Swift said the Russian Justice Ministry’s claim of victory in the case “mischaracterizes [the] implications” of the verdict: that the Navalny brothers “were deprived of their right to a fair trial and punished unfairly” by Russia.
He also said the brothers’ appeal to the European court did not circumvent Russian law. “They’re pursuing the last appeal available to them in a forum that the Russian government accepted when it signed the [European] Convention [on Human Rights],” he said.
People
Related News
March 4, 2026
In the News
Christopher Ward Analyzes Uncertain Future of State Captive‑Audience Laws
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Ward was quoted in the Law360 article, “State Captive Audience Bans Live On Despite Uncertainty,” analyzing the legal status and future prospects for state laws restricting captive audience meetings.
March 3, 2026
In the News
Patrick Daugherty Assesses Growing Popularity of Crypto ATMs
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Patrick Daugherty assessed the growing popularity of crypto ATMs in the C-Store Dive article, “Navigating the pros and cons of crypto ATMs for convenience retailers.”
March 3, 2026
In the News
Judith Waltz Weighs CMS Anti‑Fraud Tools, Provider Screening, and Moratorium Risks
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Judith Waltz was quoted in the Report on Medicare Compliance article, “Attestation May Send Some PBDs Packing; 'They May Find Things Have Eroded Over Time'” discussing the evolving anti-fraud ecosystem, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) forthcoming provider screening tool, and benefits of moratorium.