Foley Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in an article that appeared in the June 30, 2010 issue of Managing Intellectual Property titled “Federal Circuit to re-hear biotech cases post-Bilski.” Brinckerhoff discusses the Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari, and then vacate and remand biotech patent case Prometheus v Mayo in light of the decision issued in Bilski v. Kappos. She states that the contested patents in Prometheus should survive since the Federal Circuit has already found that they meet the machine-or-transformation test, but notes that the Bilski decision includes some troubling points for biotech and pharmaceutical patents. She adds that assessing whether a particular patent might promote or impede innovation as a way of determining patent eligibility could be a slippery slope.
People
Related News
December 18, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on HHS Proposed Rule Limiting Gender-Affirming Care
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on a recent proposal from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Law360 article, “HHS Proposes Hospital Ban On Gender Care For Minors.”
December 12, 2025
In the News
Foley Chairman and CEO Daljit Doogal Talks Firm Strategy and Growth, Featured in Media for Reelection
Foley & Lardner LLP Chairman and CEO Daljit Doogal is featured in The American Lawyer article, “Foley Board Taps Daljit Doogal for Second Term as Chair and CEO,” for his reelection to a second four-year term.
December 11, 2025
In the News
Carrie Hoffman Comments on SCOTUS Arbitration Jurisdiction Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Carrie Hoffman commented on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear an arbitration jurisdiction case in the Law360 article, "High Court Arb. Jurisdiction Case May Impact W&H Cases."