Discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus to reject two patents on a method for monitoring a patient’s blood to determine appropriate drug dosage as well as the decision’s potential to affect the profitability of personalized medicine, Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff said the rejection is a disruption of the status quo that may result in less funding for research. First published in an article that appeared in Reuters, Ms. Brinckerhoff’s comments later appeared in additional publications including the Chicago Tribune, Yahoo! News, BioPortfolio and The Huffington Post.
People
Related News
12 September 2024
In the News
Jeffrey Kopp on Workplace Discrimination Claims – 'Promptly investigate and take remedial action'
11 September 2024
In the News
Christopher Cain on Tech M&A Activity – 'VC firms need to have that release valve'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Cain assessed M&A activity in the technology sector in the Mergers & Acquisitions article, "Tech M&A’s Uneven Comeback: Winners and Losers are Segment-Specific."
06 September 2024
In the News
Natasha Allen on California AI Legislation – 'California definitely wants to be on the forefront'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Natasha Allen commented on recent California legislative action designed to regulate the development and deployment of artificial intelligence in the Law360 article, "Calif. Takes AI Reins With Looming Safety, Transparency Laws."