Morgan Comments on Tax Implications of Benefit Changes Due to Teleworking
October 23, 2020
SHRM
Partner Belinda Morgan was quoted in a SHRM article, “Avoiding Tax Problems with New Benefits,” about how employers can inadvertently create tax liabilities by offering new benefits to teleworking employees.
Considering how quickly employers needed to respond to the issuance of work-from-home orders at the start of pandemic, Morgan said, it’s “not surprising” that the tax treatment of a particular benefit wasn’t at the top of anyone’s mind at the time. But now that work-from-home arrangements and other workforce changes have become routine, employers may want to consider whether these new benefits are a normal business expense or a “fringe” benefit that could create tax liabilities for both the employer and the employee.
“Small rewards for good performance, such as an employer-branded hat or a similar inexpensive item, will be nontaxable,” she said. “If that reward is payable in the form of a $5 Starbucks gift card, however, it will be taxable,” even if the monetary value of those two gifts is the same.
People
Related News
December 3, 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Automotive Tariff Impact on Trucking Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller discussed the ongoing disruption in trucking demand resulting from recent automotive tariffs in the TruckingDive article, “Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers.”
November 28, 2025
In the News
Cassandra Aubert Assesses Circuit Split on SEC Disgorgement Authority
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Cassandra Aubert commented on the growing scrutiny around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's disgorgement authority in the Bloomberg Law's article, “SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case."
November 25, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Analyzes SCOTUS Tariff Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian appeared in a SupplyChainBrain video interview to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case on the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and options the administration can consider should the court strike them down.