What impact has the Sarbanes-Oxley Act had on compliance costs for public companies? Substantial, it turns out, even five years after it became law.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in mid-2002 to improve corporate financial reporting after the Enron, WorldCom, and other accounting scandals. Opinions vary widely on its success in preventing fraud and increasing investor confidence, as well as on whether its benefits justify the costs. But virtually everyone agrees that the compliance costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley have been, and continue to be, extraordinarily high—even five years after Congress passed the sweeping law.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
March 10, 2026
The Path & The Practice
Episode 133: Casey Knapp, Partner
This episode of The Path & The Practice features a conversation with Marshall Keen, a summer associate in Foley’s Dallas office.
March 10, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About…Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part II)
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decisions in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose broad-based tariffs.
March 10, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About …Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Historic IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part I)
The Supreme Court’s reversal of tariffs imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has triggered a cascading series of events. These include a forced pivot by the Trump administration towards alternative tariff authorities, activity at the Court of International Trade (CIT) aimed at securing refunds, and behind-the-scenes jockeying by companies seeking to position themselves to claim those tariff refunds.