Stephen Thaler’s quest to have patent offices throughout the world recognize AI agents as inventors is thwarted again, this time by the UK’s Supreme Court. The court rejected Thaler’s claims and held that an inventor must be a natural person, in line with other jurisdictions that have ruled on this issue.
[Thaler’s] attempt to register the patents was refused by Britain’s Intellectual Property Office on the grounds that the inventor must be a human or a company, rather than a machine. Thaler appealed to the UK’s Supreme Court, which on Wednesday unanimously rejected his appeal as under UK patent law “an inventor must be a natural person”.
View referenced article
Author(s)
Related Insights
March 31, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Coming Soon to Procurement Contracts – A Contract Clause Prohibiting Certain DEI Activities
On March 26, 2026, the President issued Executive Order 14398 titled “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors.” The Order…
March 30, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
The “But For” Dilemma – How Proposed Texas Public Utility Commission Large Load Interconnection Rules Impact Government Incentives Strategies
Companies seeking governmental incentives for expansion or relocation projects, such as tax abatements or state-level grants, must…
March 25, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
NAIC Spring 2026 Meeting Update: Homeowners Market Data Call (C) Task Force
Summary and Takeaways: The Homeowners Market Data Call (C) Task Force provided an update on the remaining implementation steps for the…