Stephen Thaler’s quest to have patent offices throughout the world recognize AI agents as inventors is thwarted again, this time by the UK’s Supreme Court. The court rejected Thaler’s claims and held that an inventor must be a natural person, in line with other jurisdictions that have ruled on this issue.
[Thaler’s] attempt to register the patents was refused by Britain’s Intellectual Property Office on the grounds that the inventor must be a human or a company, rather than a machine. Thaler appealed to the UK’s Supreme Court, which on Wednesday unanimously rejected his appeal as under UK patent law “an inventor must be a natural person”.
View referenced article
Author(s)
Related Insights
April 15, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Those Unpredictable Teen Years: A Practical Guide to Considerations for Maturing ESOPs
Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) have proven to be powerful tools for aligning employee interests with company success and creating…
April 15, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Demystifying the Duty of Prudence: DOL Proposes ERISA Safe Harbor for Designated Investment Alternatives in Retirement Plans
On March 31, 2026, the Department of Labor (DOL) published a proposed regulation (the Proposed Regulation) creating a new safe harbor for…
April 13, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
The System for Securing Tax Debts Contested by Taxpayers Made More Flexible
On April 9, 2026, a crucial amendment to Mexico’s Federal Tax Code (CFF) was published, restoring taxpayers’ ability to choose the type of tax guarantee that best suits their needs when securing tax liabilities and thereby avoiding collection actions by the tax authority while any defenses filed are being processed. This gives taxpayers back control over the protection of their interests while litigation regarding tax debts is ongoing.