Andrew C. Gresik


Andrew C. Gresik


Andrew Gresik represents clients in both state and federal courts across the country in a variety of consumer protection, fraud, and products liability disputes. Andrew has extensive experience litigating claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA) and Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CCRAA), Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Wisconsin’s Timeshare Act, and other federal and state unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws. Andrew regularly handles complex commercial and class action matters on behalf of consumer reporting agencies, financial institutions, and manufacturers of consumer products, among other clients.

During law school, Andrew was a summer associate at Foley and interned in the office of the Wisconsin Solicitor General. He also served as a judicial intern to the Honorable Daniel Kelly of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Presentations and Publications

  • “Blurring the Denominator: Murr v. Wisconsin and the Increasing Complexity of Takings Analysis,” Wisconsin Law Review, 2018 Wis. L. Rev. 1231
19 March 2024 Consumer Class Defense Counsel

Motion to Strike Damages Expert Leads to Denial of Class Certification

A recent decision denying class certification in the Northern District of Illinois highlights the importance for class action defendants of challenging a named plaintiff’s damages expert as part of a strategy for opposing class certification.
28 June 2022 Events

Navigating Innovative Technology in Today's Hospitality Industry

Foley & Lardner's Hospitality Industry Team and Innovative Technology Sector invite you to learn more about some of the hot legal topics impacting the hospitality & leisure industry during this bespoke program.
29 September 2021 Blogs

Courts Hold Contract Disputes Not Actionable Under FCRA

A string of U.S. District Court decisions has clarified liability for furnishers of credit information under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), specifically 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b), in situations where consumers dispute the legal validity of a reported debt.
28 June 2021 Blogs

Supreme Court Rules Injury at Law Insufficiently Concrete to Establish Injury in Fact

On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited opinion in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (No. 20-297).
10 February 2021 Blogs

Seventh Circuit Takes “Practical” Approach to Rule 23(a) Numerosity

Rule 23(a) numerosity is one of the less frequently litigated class certification requirements, which makes the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s recent decision in Anderson v. Weinert Enterprises, Inc. notable.
27 May 2020 Blogs

Seventh Circuit Holds Alleged Violation of Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act Confers Article III Standing

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently rejected a rather unusual argument for a plaintiff in federal court. The plaintiff asserted she lacked Article III standing to pursue her claim, and did so as a basis for remanding the case to state court.