Lacktman, Wein and Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About New CMS Physician Fee Schedule for Telehealth Coverage
August 6, 2020
mHealth Intelligence
mHealth Intelligence cited a recent blog post written by Foley Partner Nathaniel Lacktman, Of Counsel Emily Wein and Senior Counsel T.J. Ferrante in the article, “How CMS Changes, Trump’s Executive Order Affect Telehealth Coverage,” which discussed how the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services long-anticipated plan to expand telehealth coverage beyond the current pandemic has now been made public.
An advance copy of the proposed 2021 Physician Fee Schedule contains several changes to current Medicare coverage, including highlighting new opportunities for remote patient monitoring and adding nine new billing codes for connected health services. Supporters say the changes offer providers a strong transition from the emergency measures now in effect to deal with COVID-19, while some have said the changes don’t go far enough to keep the momentum going.
“Compared to last year, where CMS made only minor additions to telehealth services, the changes proposed for 2021 are bold and designed to more deliberately expand the use of telehealth technologies among Medicare beneficiaries,” Lacktman, Wein and Ferrante wrote in a post on the firm’s health care blog.
CMS is expanding the telehealth platform to allow supervising physicians to now supervise via real-time, interactive, audio-visual telemedicine. The new definition opens opportunities for telehealth and incident-to billing,” the Foley team said. “CMS acknowledged there are no Medicare regulations that explicitly prohibit eligible distant site practitioners from billing for telehealth services provided incident-to their services. But because the current definition of direct supervision requires on-site presence of the billing clinician when the service is provided, it is difficult for a billing clinician to fulfill direct supervision of services provided via telehealth incident-to their professional services by auxiliary personnel. Under the new definition, CMS believes services provided incident to the professional services of an eligible distant site physician or practitioner could be reported when they meet direct supervision requirements at both the originating and distant site through the virtual presence of the billing physician or practitioner.”
Related News
March 4, 2026
In the News
Christopher Ward Analyzes Uncertain Future of State Captive‑Audience Laws
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Ward was quoted in the Law360 article, “State Captive Audience Bans Live On Despite Uncertainty,” analyzing the legal status and future prospects for state laws restricting captive audience meetings.
March 3, 2026
In the News
Patrick Daugherty Assesses Growing Popularity of Crypto ATMs
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Patrick Daugherty assessed the growing popularity of crypto ATMs in the C-Store Dive article, “Navigating the pros and cons of crypto ATMs for convenience retailers.”
March 3, 2026
In the News
Judith Waltz Weighs CMS Anti‑Fraud Tools, Provider Screening, and Moratorium Risks
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Judith Waltz was quoted in the Report on Medicare Compliance article, “Attestation May Send Some PBDs Packing; 'They May Find Things Have Eroded Over Time'” discussing the evolving anti-fraud ecosystem, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) forthcoming provider screening tool, and benefits of moratorium.