Recent cases, including Warshak v. United States, have signaled a shift in the law of electronic monitoring. Andy Serwin, a partner in Foley’s San Diego office, authored the article, “Case Could Signal Shift in the Law of Electronic Monitoring,” which was published in the July 10 issue of the San Diego Daily Transcript. Serwin said that Warshak was the first time the court considered the identity of the court order recipient, Yahoo!, and raised new questions. In several other recent cases, the court has considered whether an expectation of privacy exists merely through employer’s policies or whether the employer actually monitors e-mails.
Related News
March 4, 2026
In the News
Christopher Ward Analyzes Uncertain Future of State Captive‑Audience Laws
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Ward was quoted in the Law360 article, “State Captive Audience Bans Live On Despite Uncertainty,” analyzing the legal status and future prospects for state laws restricting captive audience meetings.
March 3, 2026
In the News
Patrick Daugherty Assesses Growing Popularity of Crypto ATMs
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Patrick Daugherty assessed the growing popularity of crypto ATMs in the C-Store Dive article, “Navigating the pros and cons of crypto ATMs for convenience retailers.”
March 3, 2026
In the News
Judith Waltz Weighs CMS Anti‑Fraud Tools, Provider Screening, and Moratorium Risks
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Judith Waltz was quoted in the Report on Medicare Compliance article, “Attestation May Send Some PBDs Packing; 'They May Find Things Have Eroded Over Time'” discussing the evolving anti-fraud ecosystem, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) forthcoming provider screening tool, and benefits of moratorium.