Why the Difference Between Risk and Hazard Matters for Nanotechnology
April 23, 2007
Scientific progress is a balancing act: Weigh the empirical evidence and determine the appropriate balance between allowing new technologies and protecting public health. Periodically however, development is obstructed by fear diminishing physical data. In this article, Mark Mansour discusses the idea that nanotechnology is poised to turn a bad trend of regulators, preferring to use “precautionary principles” to regulate based on means of production rather on the safety of the product, on its head and show the world that regulation based on empirical data, rather than on fear, provides the best hope for a safe future.
Copyright 2007 Small Times, PennWell Corp.
Copyright 2007 Small Times, PennWell Corp.
Related Insights
June 20, 2025
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Juneteenth Program: Exploring the Hidden History to Further Our Mutual Understanding
In celebration of Juneteenth, Foley & Lardner welcomed Dr. Deirdre Cooper Owens, author and historian, for a firmwide virtual program on…
July 10, 2025
Events
Mandatory Roth Catch-up
Join Foley’s upcoming webinar on mandatory Roth catch-up contributions effective January 1, 2026. Learn how the new rules impact high earners, what guidance exists, and practical tips for plan compliance.
June 20, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Federal Court Enjoins Former Franchisees and Two Related Entities from Competing Against Franchisor
A federal court recently granted in part and denied in part a franchisor’s motion to enjoin the post-termination activities of its former…