Comments on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance Due by July 31

This week brings the July 31, 2014 deadline for submitting written comments on two USPTO patent subject matter eligibility guidance documents: The “Myriad-Mayo” Guidance issued March 4, 2014 (for claims involving laws of nature, natural phenomena, and natural products) and the “Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank” Guidance issued June 24, 2014 (for claims involving abstract ideas). These guidance documents make clear that patent applications in all technology areas could be subject to scrutiny under 35 USC § 101, so stakeholders may not want to miss this opportunity to weigh in on how the USPTO should interpret and apply the Supreme Court decisions in Mayo, Myriad and Alice Corp.

The Myriad-Mayo Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance

You can find the Myriad-Mayo Guidance here. If you are interested in submitting comments, you may find these articles helpful:

This article provides an overview of the Guidance.
This article highlights additional issues raised by the USPTO Training Slides.
This article summarizes stakeholder testimony at the July 9 USPTO Patent Eligibility Forum.
This article explains the negative impact of the guidance on pharmaceutical composition claims.
This article explains the negative impact of the guidance on vaccine claims.
This article explains how the Guidance goes to far in its scrutiny of method of manufacture claims and method of treatment claims.
This article explains how the analytical framework set forth in the Guidance is inconsistent with the Supreme Court decision in Alice Corp.

The Alice Corp. Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance

You can find the Alice Corp. Guidance here. If you are interested in submitting comments, you may find these articles helpful:

This article provides an overview of the Guidance.
This article provides an overview of the Supreme Court decision.

Submit Comments by July 31

As set forth in this Federal Register Notice, the USPTO has requested written comments on both Guidance documents July 31, 2014.

Comments on the Laws of Nature/Natural Products Guidance may be sent by electronic mail to:

myriad-mayo_2014@uspto.gov

Comments on the preliminary instructions on Alice may be sent by electronic mail to:

alice_2014@uspto.gov

Comments that apply to both may be sent to either email address.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.