What Is The Trump Pharmaceutical Policy?

17 January 2017 PharmaPatents Blog
Author(s): Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Pharmaceutical stocks took a hit after President-elect Trump criticized the industry during his January 11, 2017 press conference. But he also expressed support for the domestic pharmaceutical industry. What is the Trump pharmaceutical policy?  We attempt to read the tea leaves.

Trump Speaks Out Against Drug Prices

President-elect Trump has not yet released a comprehensive policy statement on the pharmaceutical industry, but his statements to date give the industry cause for concern.

Item 7 in Trump’s June 2016 position on healthcare reform supports the importation of drugs from other countries, ostensibly at lower prices:

Remove barriers to entry into free markets for drug providers that offer safe, reliable and cheaper products. Congress will need the courage to step away from the special interests and do what is right for America. Though the pharmaceutical industry is in the private sector, drug companies provide a public service. Allowing consumers access to imported, safe and dependable drugs from overseas will bring more options to consumers.

As reflected in the December 2016 Time Person of the Year article, Trump raised the issue of negotiating drug prices during the Presidential campaign:

“I’m going to bring down drug prices,” he says. “I don’t like what has happened with drug prices.”

And this is what he had to say about the pharmaceutical industry in his January press conference:

I think a lot of industries are going to be coming back [to the U.S.].

We’ve got to get our drug industry back. Our drug industry has been disastrous. They’re leaving left and right. They supply our drugs, but they don’t make them here, to a large extent. And the other thing we have to do is create new bidding procedures for the drug industry because they’re getting away with murder.

Pharma, pharma has a lot of lobbies and a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power and there’s very little bidding on drugs. We’re the largest buyer of drugs in the world and yet we don’t bid properly and we’re going to start bidding and we’re going to save billions of dollars over a period of time.

In the wake of these statements, the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index dropped 3%, and Standard & Poor’s 500 Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences Index was down 1.7% (although stock prices have since been recovering).

Can Trump Bring Down Drug Prices?

According to this article from The Hill, the U.S. government is the largest purchaser of drugs through the federal Medicare program. However, as explained in this Bloomberg article, the U.S. government “is specifically prohibited from negotiating prices with drugmakers in Medicare’s drug benefit program.” Can a new Trump pharmaceutical policy bring down drug prices?

Although both Trump and GOP leadership want to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (ACA), repealing the ACA would not change the Medicare law. Moreover, it is not clear how much support Trump would have for implementing a Medicare drug price negotiation program–or which side of the aisle it would come from. Until now, it has been Democrats who supported giving Medicare the authority to negotiate drug prices. Indeed, as reported in The Hill, Kevin Brady (R-Texas), Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said he would not support Trump’s proposal to allow Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices. Of course, that was then …. 

Can Pharmaceutical Companies Self-Regulate Pricing?

It is possible that Trump’s spotlight will lead pharmaceutical companies to control drug prices on their own. As reported in The Washington Post, Brent Saunders, chief executive of Allergan, vowed in September “to limit drug prices to single-digit percentage price hikes, once a year,” and Novo Nordisk made a similar announcement in November.

As reported by Reuters, following the January press conference, PhRMA President and CEO Steve Ubl stated that the industry is “committed to working with President-elect Trump and Congress to improve American competitiveness and protect American jobs.” As reported by FiercePharma, the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) stated that it is “eager to discuss ways in which all parties can work together to ensure patients have access to the medicines they need, that we do not limit treatment options available for patients and that America remains the global leader in the development of innovative new treatments and cures.”

Perhaps Trump will be content to address drug prices on a drug-by-drug or company-by-company basis, similar to his recent approach to U.S. manufacturing jobs.

As always, the views expressed in this article are personal to the authors, and not offered as the views of Foley & Lardner LLP or its clients.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Episode 3: The Future Powered By Hyperscale Cloud Computing with David Sloan of Microsoft
06 December 2022
Innovative Technology Insights
2023 M&A Outlook
05 December 2022
Foley Ignite
COVID-related Form I-9 Remote Verification Flexibilities Extended Through July 31, 2023
05 December 2022
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Learnings from Recent Physician Practice Private Equity Transactions
05 December 2022
Health Care Law Today
What You Should Know About Payor/Provider Convergence
25-26 January 2023
Los Angeles, CA
ATA EDGE2022 Policy Conference | American Telemedicine Association
7-9 December 2022
Washington, D.C.
CLE Weeks
5-16 December 2022
Milwaukee, WI
Foley Sponsors Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year® Program
1 December 2021 - 30 November 2022
Michigan and Northwest Ohio Region