Highlights of Foley’s Community Solar Webinar

24 February 2020 Renewable Energy Outlook Blog
Authors: Darin M. Lowder John T. Dunlap Natalie S. Neals

Foley attorneys Darin Lowder and John Dunlap recently hosted a Foley Energy Webinar with panelists Ben Cooper from KeyBank, Eric Barr from U.S. Bancorp, and Jared Donald from Amp Solar to discuss recent trends in financing community solar projects.  Highlights of the webinar are listed below, and the full webinar is available here.

The webinar provided a survey and overview of the community solar projects market in the United States. Community solar projects deliver electricity to a local utility, which in turn allocates net metering or bill credits to retail energy customers (referred to as "subscribers") in accordance with individual subscription agreements entered into between the subscribers and the project owner. The subscribers pay the project owner, rather than the utility, for their allocated share of the credits.  

Figure 1: Overview of Community Solar Transaction Structure

Figure 1

Community solar programs are developed by states and utilities with a focus on community benefits, which may include the redevelopment of brownfield sites and incentives to include low to moderate income (“LMI”) subscribers in the programs to make the benefits more widely accessible.

Three established, key programs discussed in the webinar include the Massachusetts SMART program, the Minnesota program and the New York program (including New York’s VDER scheme for valuing net metering credits). Additionally, our firm continues to monitor newer, emerging programs in a variety of states, including those shown in Figure 2, which have implemented or proposed programs.

Figure 2: States Implementing or Proposing New Community Solar Programs in 2019

Figure 2

The panel discussed financing considerations applicable to both debt and tax equity, which sponsors and financing parties should address, including:

  • Confirming aspects of the project portfolios themselves, including (a) whether the portfolios will be “closed” (i.e., the projects included in the financing are set at the time of closing) or “open” (i.e., the projects included in the financing are not set at the time of closing and the financing is structured in a way that permits the addition of additional or different projects that meet certain criteria over time) and (b) the amount of variety within the portfolio (e.g., portfolios spanning multiple states and community solar programs are more complicated to design and structure, and may be more difficult for tax equity investors and lenders to underwrite)
  • Level of management required for a large number of subscribers over an extended period of time, which can increase developer cost and may require third party management to address subscriber retention concerns
  • Focus on subscriber creditworthiness, including the interplay with LMI subscribers and commercial/municipal offtakers that are not rated
  • Program eligibility under specific programs, since many community solar programs are capped in size, and projects may not be considered financeable until they are awarded participation in the program
  • Inconsistency in the timing of payments, which can make lenders hesitant to make construction loans based on those revenue streams

Please contact Darin Lowder, John Dunlap, or other attorneys on the Energy Industry Team, with questions or to learn more about these rapidly growing programs.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services