Vaccine-Related Paid Leave Required for Employees in City of Los Angeles

12 July 2021 Blog
Authors: Mikle S. Jew
Published To: Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business

On June 24, 2021, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti issued an Emergency Public Health Order (Order) regarding mandatory “COVID-19 Vaccine Leave” upon an employee’s request. The Order explains that it has been issued in a bid to ensure that workers in the geographic boundaries of the city of Los Angeles are not “forced to decide between a paycheck and securing a vaccine to safeguard their own well-being and promote public health.” 

COVID-19 Vaccine Leave Compliance

The order defined COVID-19 Vaccine Leave to include the time an employee spends traveling to and from an appointment, receiving the injection, and recovering from vaccination-related side effects that prevent the employee from being able to work or telework.  Under the Order, an employer shall provide COVID-19 Vaccine Leave upon the oral or written request of an employee—defined as an individual who has been employed with the employer for at least 60 days—as follows:

  • Employers with 25 or fewer employees shall:

    • Provide a full-time employee (40 or more hours per week) up to four hours of COVID-19 Vaccine Leave to obtain each vaccine injection, and up to eight hours of COVID-19 Vaccine Leave to recover from any vaccination-related side effects.

    • Provide a part-time employee (less than 40 hours per week) up to the prorated amount of four hours of COVID-19 Vaccine Leave per injection based on the average number of hours worked in the 60 days preceding the injection, and up to the prorated amount of eight hours of COVID-19 Vaccine Leave to recover from any vaccination-related side effects.

Employers with more than 25 employees shall provide the same COVID-19 Vaccine Leave described above, provided, however, that the employee has already exhausted all available leave under Labor Code section 248.2 or the Mayor’s Public Order re: Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Due to COVID-19.

Effective Date

The Order’s effective date was June 24, 2021, but the requirements described above apply retroactively to January 1, 2021.  Any employees who took leave to receive a COVID-19 vaccine beginning on or after January 1, 2021, must be duly compensated under the Order upon written or oral request.  The Order is currently set to terminate on its own on September 30, 2021, with minor exceptions for employees who take leave on or around the time of expiration.

Rate of Pay

Nonexempt employees entitled to COVID-19 Vaccine Leave are to be compensated at the highest of the following rates:

  • The normal rate of pay for the workweek in which the leave is taken;
  • The city of Los Angeles’s minimum wage ($15 per hour as of July 1, 2021); or
  • The average hourly pay for the preceding 60 days, not including overtime.

Exempt employees are to be compensated for the leave in the same manner as the employer calculates other forms of paid leave. However, leave required by the Order is not to exceed $511 per day (or $255.50 per each four hours), or $1,022 in the aggregate.

Next Steps

Employers may not require an employee to use other paid or unpaid leave prior to using the COVID-19 Vaccine Leave required by this Order.  If you believe the Order applies to your operations in the city of Los Angeles, you should consult with counsel to ensure proper compliance with the new Order, and to explore the financial implications of compliance—including whether federal tax credits or offsets are available.

Although the Order applies specifically to Los Angeles, employers everywhere should be on the lookout for similar initiatives to provide employees with COVID-19 vaccine-related leave rights.  For example, as we reported recently, the new OSHA emergency temporary standard for COVID-19 provides a variety of leave rights to health care workers.  We will continue to keep you apprised of developments in this area.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights

Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
30 July 2021
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
$4.24M Now the Average Cost Per Data Breach!
30 July 2021
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Podcast Episode 56: All Things Summer Associate Recruiting
30 July 2021
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Podcast to Live Panel Discussion
29 July 2021
Foley Career Perspectives
30th Annual Law of Product Distribution & Franchise Seminar
29 September | 7 & 20 October 2021
Milwaukee | Chicago | Dallas
7th National Telehealth Summit
4-5 October 2021
Miami Beach, FL
AHLA Fraud & Compliance Forum
21-22 September 2021
Baltimore, MD
2nd Clinical Trial Agreements Forum
16-17 September 2021
Online Livestream