USPTO To Propose Paperless Patents

13 December 2021 PharmaPatents Blog
Authors: Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

In a Director’s Forum blog post published December 10, 2021, the USPTO announced plans to issue proposed rule changes relating to the format in which U.S. patents are issued, making electronic patents the norm, with something akin to today’s ribboned copies available upon request (and for a nominal fee). Many of you reading this may wonder what took so long, but as with many government agency practices, it turns out there’s a statute that had to be reckoned with before the USPTO could go paperless.

Issue of Patent

Chapter 14 of 35 U.S.C. relates to “Issue of Patent.” 35 USC § 153 provides:

Patents shall be issued in the name of the United States of America, under the seal of the Patent and Trademark Office, and shall be signed by the Director or have his signature placed thereon and shall be recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office.

So, before the USPTO could transition to electronic patents, it had to figure out how to issue them “signed by the Director” or with “his signature placed thereon.”

Once that hurdle was overcome, the USPTO had to address 37 CFR § 1.315, entitled “Delivery of patent,” which provides:

The patent will be delivered or mailed upon issuance to the correspondence address of record.

That’s where the proposed rule changes will come in.

As explained in the blog post, the USPTO will propose to instead “issue the patent electronically”—“with the USPTO seal and the Director’s signature” —via Patent Center and Patent Application Image Retrieval (PAIR)). According to Drew Hirshfeld, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, the USPTO believes this change will result in faster issuance, i.e., within one week after the patent number is assigned.

What About Trademarks?

According to the Director’s Blog post, no rule change would be required to implement similar changes for trademark registration certificates, but the USPTO still plans to solicit public feedback on its proposal to replace paper registration certificates with digital versions. Since the USPTO “currently issue[s] 6,000-9,000 printed trademark registration certificates per week,” this change will significantly reduce paper processing and associated costs.

What If I Still Want A Pretty Paper Patent?

The  Director’s Blog post reassures  stakeholders who may still want paper “presentation copies” of their patents and trademark registration certificates. Specifically, the USPTO contemplates offering presentation copies “with an embossed gold seal and a Director’s signature” for a nominal fee of $25 per copy.

Does this mean the proposed changes will include reducing the issue fee by $25?

I am guessing most stakeholders with large patent portfolios will welcome this change, especially with the option of obtaining presentation copies when warranted. Even now, we have clients who do not want us to forward their ribboned copies, and some for whom we still are holding their patents until their Covid-19 working-from-home status ends. 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.