In Starbucks Corporation v Wolfe’s Borough Coffee Inc (Case 08-3331-cv, December 3 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reversed the decision of the district court in which the latter had held that the mark CHARBUCKS did not dilute the mark STARBUCKS.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
July 25, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Thorny Laws That ICHRA Vendors Should Consider, Part Three: FinTech Edition
We continue our series on the legal and regulatory challenges facing individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs); this…
July 24, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…
July 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The One Big Beautiful Bill and Workplace Immigration Enforcement
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” signed into law by President Trump on July 4, 2025, will fund government efforts to continue to…