In Starbucks Corporation v Wolfe’s Borough Coffee Inc (Case 08-3331-cv, December 3 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reversed the decision of the district court in which the latter had held that the mark CHARBUCKS did not dilute the mark STARBUCKS.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
June 13, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Eighth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment to Insurer in Dispute with Construction Project Owner Over Lost Rental Income
On Monday, June 9, 2025, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Missouri real estate developer could not recover insurance…
June 13, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Your Company Received an ICE Notice of Inspection — Now What?
“Worksite enforcement operations are going to massively expand,” according to a June 12, 2025, interview[1] with Border Czar Tom Homan….
June 13, 2025
Energy Current
Key Provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R.1) Related to Foreign Ownership and Foreign Supply (FEOC)
Applicable Limitations on Tax Credits under Sections 48E, 45Y, and 45X: The below summary describes provisions in the One Big Beautiful…