In Starbucks Corporation v Wolfe’s Borough Coffee Inc (Case 08-3331-cv, December 3 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reversed the decision of the district court in which the latter had held that the mark CHARBUCKS did not dilute the mark STARBUCKS.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
July 7, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Florida Bucks Trend, Enacts New Employer-Friendly Noncompete Statute
While the recent trend across the country has been to restrict noncompete agreements, Florida has just made it easier for employers to…
July 7, 2025
Health Care Law Today
DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group: Focus on Medicare Payment Suspensions
In a July 2, 2025, press release, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new “DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group” (the…
July 2, 2025
Energy Current
Has SCOTUS Pre-decided Whether the NRC Can License Private Off-Site High-Level Nuclear Waste Storage Facilities?
On June 18, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in NRC v. Texas, issued an opinion holding that the State of Texas did not have standing to…