As an accompaniment to our biweekly series on “What Every Multinational Should Know About” various international trade, enforcement, and compliance topics, we are introducing a second series of quick-hit pieces on multinational company compliance best practices. Give us two minutes, and we will give you five suggested compliance best practices that will benefit your international regulatory compliance program.
Now that Customs collects full electronic data on all imports, its ability to identify potential underpayment of tariffs and pursue other violations of Customs requirements is greatly enhanced. To deal with this new reality, here are five things that frequent importers should consider examining to ensure their Customs compliance reflects the new enforcement reality:
- Enhance/Implement a Customs Compliance Program. It is surprising that even some large importers do not have a Customs compliance program in place, or they have compliance measures that are dated or not well adapted to current import patterns. If your company does not have a detailed Customs manual that is tailored to its products, pattern of imports, and highest-risk imports (USMCA imports, those from China, etc.) or has let its Customs compliance manual get out of date, then it probably is time to update your Customs compliance measures. Remember, if your Customs compliance consists of thinking that “the Customs broker will take care of everything,” then you have no Customs compliance program.
- Conduct a Classification and Valuation Review. Importers should regularly review the items they commonly import, confirm the accuracy of HTS classifications, and keep the results in a comprehensive Customs Classification Index. These classifications should be maintained in a tariff classification database that is available to Customs brokers, freight forwarders, or any other party responsible for ensuring correct entry. Importers also should review the methodologies used to calculate the ad valorem value of entries, including whether the valuation includes all off-invoice items, such as royalties and assists.
- If You Import from Related Parties, Confirm You Have a Customs Transfer Pricing Study. Customs requires that imports from related parties be valued in accordance with market pricing. Notably, Customs does not accept IRS transfer pricing studies to benchmark-related party pricing for purposes of establishing transaction value.
- Conduct an Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Product Review. Frequent importers should carefully review their entries to ensure they have identified all potentially applicable antidumping or countervailing duty orders, including through an accurate identification of the country of origin of goods that fall within the scope of any AD or CVD orders.
- Evaluate FTA Claims. Importers should review any FTA or duty preference program instructions to determine their accuracy. Common issues to confirm are whether the regional content requirements are met, whether required certificates of origin are at hand at the time of entry, and that all required documentation to support claimed free trade preferences is maintained for five years.
Would you like more practical compliance tips like these? Click Here To Register for our email list to receive future biweekly emails and practical international regulatory compliance tips.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
October 23, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Best Practices for a Customs Disclosure in the New Tariff Environment
In the current global trade environment, importers are facing an unprecedented convergence of pressures. A sharp rise in new tariffs, the increasingly sophisticated data-mining of entry data by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and a more aggressive government-enforcement posture have made even minor compliance failures potentially costly.
October 9, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
Foreign Terrorist Organization Designations Provide DOJ With New Civil Forfeiture Authorities and Opportunities
Civil forfeiture is becoming an increasingly important tool in the U.S. Justice Department’s (DOJ) campaign against Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs), Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs), and other sanctioned parties. This development is part of the Trump Administration’s ongoing campaign against cartels and other TCOs, which most recently has involved the apparent determination that cartels are nonstate actors in a non-international armed conflict with the United States, military strikes on Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean Sea, and the designation of the Barrio 18 a/k/a 18th Street gang as an FTO.
September 19, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
Don’t Forget, October Brings New DOJ Data Security Program Obligations
As previously reported, October 6, 2025, marks the final deadline in the implementation of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Data Security Program (DSP). As of that date, businesses dealing with U.S. bulk personal data or government-related data need to be compliant with due diligence, auditing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.