Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Patenting: A Look Back to Adams and His Battery
December 31, 2007
Foley Senior Counsel J. Steven Rutt authored an article that appeared in the November/December 2007 issue of the Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society titled, “Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Patenting: A Look Back to Adams and His Battery.”
Related Insights
July 20, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Tennessee Enacts Non-Compete Law: $70K Income Threshold and Rebuttable Presumptions on Duration
July 20, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
NLRB Advice Memo Concludes Noncompete Agreements Do Not Violate the National Labor Relations Act
July 20, 2026
Practical Guidance for Pharmaceutical Method-of-Use Patent Claims After Teva v. Eli Lilly and In re Xencor
In our companion article, Pharmaceutical Method-of-Use Claims After Teva v. Eli Lilly and In re Xencor: Written Description, Enablement, and the Known-Compound Genus, we analyzed two recent Federal Circuit decisions that offer complementary guidance on a recurring question in patent law: what must a patent specification disclose to satisfy written description and enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112 when the claimed invention is the new use of a genus of known compounds or compositions?