Waiting is the Hardest Part: Despite Physician's 'Obstructive' Behavior and Refusal to Cooperate, Hearing Officer Lacks Authority to Terminate Peer Review Hearing
May 1, 2009
Shirley P. Morrigan and Nathaniel M. Lacktman analyze the recent California Supreme Court decision in Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital & Medical Center and offer advice for medical staff peer review bodies in light of the ruling.
Reprinted with permission from the California Society of Health Law Attorneys. Article first appeared in the Spring 2009 issue of California Health Law News.
Author(s)
Related Insights
March 16, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About …Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Historic IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part VIII)
In a recent filing before the CIT, CBP described a new capability being developed within the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) called CAPE (Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries).
March 16, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About …Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Historic IEEPA Tariff Case (Part VII)
The Supreme Court’s ruling rejected IEEPA as a basis for broad tariffs, but it did not call into question tariffs imposed under other trade statutes. That means the decision removed one legal mechanism, not the broader policy goals that drove the tariffs in the first place.
March 16, 2026
Energy Current
One Big Beautiful Bill (“OB3”) and FEOC: Current Considerations for Debt Financings
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “Act”), passed in July 2024, and related recent additional guidance, has created ripple effects…