Savannah L. Levin
Associate
Savannah Levin is a Commercial Litigation associate in the firm’s Los Angeles office.
Prior to joining Foley, Savannah worked as a law clerk for two other law firms. There, she was responsible for conducting research and writing memoranda regarding client conflicts and negligent supervision. Additionally, Savannah externed for Superior Court of Orange County Judge Deborah C. Servino where she prepared weekly memoranda in anticipation of the week’s Law and Motion calendar.
Savannah began her career with Foley as a summer associate.
Accolades and Recognition
- Law.com, finalist for Most Prominent Newcomer (2025)
Savannah Levin Highlighted for Most Promising Newcomer Recognition
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Savannah Levin is featured in a Q&A with The Recorder for her recognition as a finalist in the Most Promising Newcomer category at the Law.com California Legal Awards.
James McFall and Savannah Levin Named Finalists at Law.com's California Legal Awards
Foley & Lardner LLP partner James McFall and associate Savannah Levin are finalists for Law.com's 2025 California Legal Awards.
Trump Administration’s Executive Orders Attempt To Reset Sex & Gender Identity Issues in Women’s Sports
In January 2025, the Republican Party took control of both houses of Congress and the White House, portending seismic policy shifts around women’s and college sports.
No Harm, No Foul: Greenwashing Lawsuit Dismissed for Lack of Article III Standing
It is well-settled that under Article III of the Constitution, United States federal courts are limited to trying “cases and controversies.”
Foley LA Prepares Boys & Girls Clubs Students for Youth of the Year Competition
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Nicholas Gross and associates Trevor Mullin, Kathryn Petrosky, Jordan Smiley, Savannah Levin, Troy Tessem, and Tam Wheat helped prepare students from the Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Los Angeles for the annual Youth of the Year competition.
Should I Stay or Should I Go: Supreme Court to Consider Whether Federal Courts Can Dismiss or Must Stay Cases Pending Arbitration
On January 12, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Smith, et al. v. Spizzirri, et al., No. 22-1218 to consider whether a district court must stay a case — rather than dismiss it — when presented with an enforceable arbitration agreement.