Sectors
A man with short brown hair and glasses, dressed in a dark suit, white shirt, and tie, poses against a plain gray background—reflecting the professional image often found in corporate law office settings.

Parker White

Associate

Parker White assists clients in matters regarding national security and international trade, reinsurance disputes, and federal civil rights violations. He has published several articles on international arbitration, U.S. sanctions, and international trade. He is a primary member of the Commercial Litigation Practice Group and a secondary member of the Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations Practice Group.

In his previous role, Parker served as a judicial clerk at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, supervising 125+ civil cases on the general civil and habeas dockets, including cases involving employment discrimination, insurance, FLSA, ERISA, and civil rights. He drafted orders on motions including motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, and motions to remand. He has also worked for a federal judge in the Northern District of California, where he drafted orders in cases involving maritime law, securities law, and criminal law—including the Elizabeth Holmes criminal trial.

During his time at Harvard Law School, Parker received internships with the Office of the Legal Counselor at the U.S. State Department and an international law firm in The Hague. He was a summer associate at the Public International Law & Policy Group in Washington, D.C.

Parker also holds a master’s in Public Policy from Harvard Kennedy School, through which he worked for the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, reporting on disinformation in elections and armed conflicts, and researching United States and Russia relations for Evelyn Farkas. He was a Fulbright AmeriCorps volunteer in Alabama, his home state.

Awards and Recognition

  • Rhodes Scholarship Finalist
The image shows the facade of the United States Supreme Court building, featuring Corinthian columns and sculpted figures above the entrance—a symbol of justice often referenced by Chicago lawyers specializing in intellectual property law.
March 11, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About…Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part III)

The importer of record is the entity that initially pays all tariffs and thus is the entity that would receive any IEEPA tariff refunds. Nonetheless, behind the scenes there often are a variety of mechanisms importers of record may have used to handle the often unexpected tariffs, including pushing back on suppliers for price concessions, using surcharges to pass along tariffs, or generally increasing price. In many cases, other parties may be looking to share any potential refunds.
The image shows the facade of the United States Supreme Court building, featuring Corinthian columns and sculpted figures above the entrance—a symbol of justice often referenced by Chicago lawyers specializing in intellectual property law.
March 10, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About…Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part II)

On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decisions in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose broad-based tariffs.
The image shows the facade of the United States Supreme Court building, featuring Corinthian columns and sculpted figures above the entrance—a symbol of justice often referenced by Chicago lawyers specializing in intellectual property law.
March 10, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About …Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Historic IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part I)

The Supreme Court’s reversal of tariffs imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has triggered a cascading series of events. These include a forced pivot by the Trump administration towards alternative tariff authorities, activity at the Court of International Trade (CIT) aimed at securing refunds, and behind-the-scenes jockeying by companies seeking to position themselves to claim those tariff refunds.
The facade of the United States Supreme Court building featuring tall columns and statues under a clear blue sky, symbolizing the authority that guides chicago lawyers and shapes intellectual property law.
March 6, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About … the Court of International Trade’s Order to Refund all IEEPA Tariffs

The litigation over the now-invalidated IEEPA tariffs continues to move at a remarkable pace.
February 27, 2026 Foley Viewpoints

What Every Multinational Should Know About… Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part V)

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision invalidating the IEEPA tariffs, attention is now shifting from whether the tariffs were...
February 27, 2026 Foley Viewpoints

What Every Multinational Should Know About… Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part IV)

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision invalidating the IEEPA tariffs, attention is now shifting from whether the tariffs were...